CMMC Level 2
Level 2 aligns to NIST SP 800-171 and requires demonstrated implementation for contractors handling CUI on applicable DoD contracts.
Explore CMMC GovernanceDefense Industrial Base (DIB)
Your cybersecurity posture is your contract eligibility.
Cyturity helps defense contractors structure CMMC readiness, CUI governance, and evidence management so contract eligibility can be supported and consistently maintained.
The Problem
The 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 security requirements are understood. The governance around them is missing.
For defense contractors, cybersecurity compliance is not a regulatory checkbox. It is a revenue requirement.
When a solicitation or contract includes a CMMC requirement, weak or unsupported readiness can affect eligibility, renewals, subcontractor relationships, and the federal work that depends on the required CMMC status.
The 110 security requirements in NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 are understood as a list. What often does not exist is the governance structure that keeps those requirements implemented, evidenced, and maintained across the organization.
CUI scoping may not reflect current collaboration platforms, cloud environments, engineering tools, subcontractor relationships, and remote work patterns. SPRS scores may not match verifiable evidence. Subcontractor oversight may rely on self attestation. Incident response plans may not reflect DFARS reporting obligations.
CMMC and CUI governance should protect contract eligibility while helping program, IT, security, and business leaders keep delivery on schedule.
The DIB Regulatory Landscape
Six requirements define defense contract eligibility
NIST SP 800-171
Defense contractors need implementation across 14 control families, with evidence that practices are operating.
SPRS score accuracy
The self assessed SPRS score needs to match the implementation and evidence that can be defended.
DFARS 252.204-7012
Incident response and reporting obligations need to be reflected in the governance program.
CUI program requirements
CUI handling requirements affect data flows, system scope, subcontractor relationships, and evidence.
Flow-down requirements
Prime contractors need governance for subcontractor compliance when CUI flows through the supply chain.
The Cyturity Approach
Readiness that holds between assessments
CUI scoping and governance that reflects current reality
We map CUI flows across collaboration platforms, cloud systems, engineering tools, subcontractor connections, and remote work.
Evidence management that sustains SPRS accuracy
We organize practice documentation, ownership assignments, implementation evidence, and maintenance cadence.
Pre-assessment readiness validation
We assess implementation and evidence before a C3PAO does, including practice validation, evidence review, CUI scope verification, and SPRS score reconciliation.
Sustained compliance governance
We define ownership, change management triggers, subcontractor oversight, DFARS incident response alignment, and evidence maintenance processes.
Where to Start
Connect the industry problem to the next useful step
Advisory Diagnostic
Assess ownership, evidence, decision flow, and operating gaps before choosing a remediation path.
Explore Advisory DiagnosticCMMC Readiness
Build CUI scope, ownership, and evidence that support defensible assessment readiness.
Explore CMMCEvidence Expectations
Define evidence that stays current through normal operation instead of being rebuilt for review.
Explore Evidence ExpectationsThe Outcome
CMMC readiness that remains defensible
CMMC readiness is not a one-time event.
Defense contractors that maintain competitive compliance posture are the ones that built CUI governance, evidence management, and practice accountability into normal operations.
When a C3PAO asks for evidence, the answer should come from a maintained governance structure, not a last-minute documentation sprint.
Start With One Meeting
See what to fix first.
Clarify the CUI scope, evidence, and ownership gaps most likely to weaken SPRS or CMMC defensibility.
See What To Fix First