Unified evidence management
We define one evidence structure that supports SOC 2, banking partner reviews, enterprise customers, regulators, cyber insurers, and board reporting.
Financial Technology (FinTech)
Cyturity helps financial technology companies define cybersecurity governance, regulatory compliance, and evidence management structures that support enterprise customer security requirements, banking partner oversight, and financial services regulatory obligations within a single operating program.
The Problem
FinTech companies occupy a difficult position.
They move at technology company speed while being evaluated through financial services expectations. Enterprise customers expect SOC 2, security questionnaires, evidence, incident response maturity, and vendor risk documentation. Banking partners expect third party risk governance, operational resilience, access control, incident reporting, and contractual oversight. Regulators may expect state licensing compliance, NYDFS alignment, GLBA safeguards, PCI DSS controls, DORA readiness for EU operations, or digital asset requirements.
Many FinTech governance programs grow in fragments.
One program supports SOC 2. Another responds to banking partner questionnaires. Another handles regulatory requirements. Another supports enterprise sales. Another addresses cyber insurance.
FinTech governance has to support growth, enterprise sales, integrations, customer security reviews, SOC 2, cloud change, and product velocity.
The Cyturity Approach
We define one evidence structure that supports SOC 2, banking partner reviews, enterprise customers, regulators, cyber insurers, and board reporting.
We align governance, controls, evidence, incident response, third party oversight, and resilience with banking partner expectations.
We map applicable obligations across NYDFS, GLBA, PCI DSS, DORA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and customer requirements.
We define dependency mapping, recovery validation, resilience testing, and decision governance around payment, lending, banking, and customer facing operations.
We design governance that can keep pace with product releases, cloud changes, new markets, customer requirements, and partner expectations.
The FinTech Governance Landscape
FinTech buyers expect current evidence, certifications, vendor risk documentation, access control, encryption, incident response, and resilience.
Banking relationships create third party risk obligations that often exceed what early stage governance programs were built to support.
State money transmitter licensing, NYDFS requirements, GLBA safeguards, SEC related expectations, PCI DSS, and DORA may apply depending on the business model.
Explore Financial ServicesFinTech downtime can affect payments, lending, banking relationships, customer trust, and regulatory posture.
Certifications need governance behind them, especially when customers and banking partners probe beyond the report.
Where to Start
Clarify the issue, the decision that is blocking progress, and the first useful priority.
Explore Strategic BriefingStructure Type II ownership, evidence, scope, and exception handling so readiness holds.
Explore SOC 2Clarify accountability, authority, evidence, operating rhythm, and escalation.
Explore Control OwnershipThe Outcome
FinTech governance needs to support three audiences at once.
Enterprise customers want proof. Banking partners want oversight. Regulators want defensible governance.
The FinTech companies that scale more consistently are the ones that structure governance for all three instead of rebuilding the program for each request.
Start With One Meeting
Clarify which customer, partner, or regulatory requirement is slowing growth and what governance decision moves it forward.
See What To Fix First