NERC CIP
Bulk electric system operators need governance, evidence, asset categorization, access control, incident response, and change management structures that hold under audit scrutiny.
Energy & Critical Infrastructure
Cyturity helps energy providers, utilities, and critical infrastructure operators define OT and IT governance structures, NERC CIP compliance programs, and operational resilience frameworks that protect reliability and hold up under federal scrutiny.
The Problem
Energy and critical infrastructure operators face a risk environment where cyber disruption can quickly become a public safety event.
OT and IT convergence has changed the attack surface. SCADA systems, distributed control systems, industrial control systems, vendor remote access, cloud management platforms, and enterprise IT networks now intersect in ways legacy governance programs were not designed to manage.
Many compliance programs still reflect older assumptions.
NERC CIP documentation may pass an audit while OT asset inventories remain incomplete. Vendor remote access may not be governed consistently. The IT and OT boundary may be more permeable than the compliance program assumes. Recovery documentation may not reflect the constraints of systems engineered for reliability, longevity, and safety.
Governance should connect cyber risk, OT and IT dependencies, vendor access, incident response, recovery decisions, and day to day operational continuity.
The Regulatory and Risk Landscape
Bulk electric system operators need governance, evidence, asset categorization, access control, incident response, and change management structures that hold under audit scrutiny.
FERC and NERC expectations require defensible cybersecurity governance connected to reliability.
Pipeline and surface transportation operators face specific cybersecurity requirements and reporting expectations.
Critical infrastructure operators face baseline expectations across asset visibility, security controls, incident response, and resilience.
The governance challenge is not only control implementation. It is coordinating risk across operational technology, enterprise IT, vendors, and cloud connected services.
The Cyturity Approach
Cyturity defines the governance structure, execution path, ownership model, and evidence approach across OT and IT environments. Client teams and technical partners handle technical delivery where needed.
We help define ownership, accountability, evidence, and decision structures across IT and OT environments.
We define governance and evidence structures that support compliance without losing sight of operational risk.
We map and govern third party access, vendor dependencies, remote maintenance, and supplier disruption exposure.
We align recovery planning, testing, dependency mapping, and executive decision flow to the realities of critical infrastructure operations.
We structure documentation and evidence so the program can withstand scrutiny from regulators, insurers, boards, and internal leadership.
Where to Start
Assess ownership, evidence, decision flow, and operating gaps before choosing a remediation path.
Explore Advisory DiagnosticDefine recovery authority, sequencing, escalation, and decisions before the RTO clock starts.
Explore Recovery GovernanceMap the systems, vendors, data, people, and facilities each critical service requires.
Explore Dependency MappingThe Outcome
Critical infrastructure operators need governance that reflects how infrastructure actually operates.
The organizations that withstand scrutiny and recover more effectively are the ones that connect compliance, OT reality, vendor governance, resilience, and executive decision making into one operating structure.
When FERC, NERC, CISA, TSA, or sector examiners ask whether the program reflects actual operations, the answer should come from current governance, not outdated documentation.
Start With One Meeting
Clarify the control, dependency, or recovery governance gap that could affect safe and reliable operations.
See What To Fix First