Production scale recovery testing
We design tests against production conditions where appropriate, including current data volumes, configurations, dependencies, and recovery sequences.
Resilience Testing and Validation
A test designed to pass is not a test.
Cyturity designs and facilitates resilience tests that reflect production conditions, recovery across multiple systems, throughput constraints, and real decision conditions so you find the gaps before an incident does.
The Problem
Most tests are designed to succeed.
Most resilience testing is designed to succeed.
Tests are scheduled in advance. Scenarios are known. Scope is controlled. One application is tested at a time. Development or staging environments are used. Teams are prepared.
Real incidents do not work that way.
A real incident affects multiple systems. It runs against production data volume. It exposes dependencies added after the last test. It creates throughput constraints. It pulls recovery resources into status calls, executive briefings, vendor escalations, and regulatory discussions.
The Cyturity Approach
Designing tests that find the gaps before an incident does
Resilience testing should validate decisions, dependencies, communications, escalation paths, and recovery evidence, not just whether a technical restore can complete in a controlled window.
Scenario design across multiple systems
We design recovery exercises that reflect real incident patterns, including competing priorities and shared constraints.
Throughput constraint analysis
We assess storage, network, infrastructure, cloud, and resource constraints under concurrent recovery conditions.
Tabletop and operational exercise design
We include executive decision points, regulatory notification pressure, vendor escalation, business prioritization, and communication demands.
Plan currency validation
We check whether recovery plans reflect current cloud environments, vendor relationships, system upgrades, and data growth before testing begins.
Who This Is For
Four situations that call for a real resilience test
Organizations that have never tested recovery at production scale
You need to know whether capability holds before an incident decides for you.
Organizations that experienced a recovery failure
A real disruption or exercise showed that the plan did not work as expected.
Organizations preparing for examination or cyber insurance renewal
You need evidence of tested capability, not just documented plans.
Organizations that changed infrastructure since the last test
Cloud migration, major upgrades, vendor changes, and data growth can invalidate prior test results.
Where to Start
Connect the resilience problem to the next useful step
Advisory Diagnostic
Assess ownership, evidence, decision flow, and operating gaps before choosing a remediation path.
Explore Advisory Diagnostic
Executive Recovery Readiness
Prepare leaders to make recovery tradeoffs when the plan no longer fits the event.
Explore Executive Recovery
Resilience Program Maturity Assessment
Establish the current state, priority gaps, and the next practical improvement path.
Assess Resilience MaturityThe Outcome
Evidence that recovery works under real conditions
Recovery capability is not what the plan says. It is what the test proves.
Testing should produce evidence, surface gaps, validate assumptions, and support better recovery decisions.
A test designed to pass gives you a passing grade. A test designed to expose assumptions gives leadership a more reliable view of recovery readiness.
Start With One Meeting
See what to fix first.
Clarify what recovery capability needs to be tested, what evidence should be produced, and what failure would actually mean.
See What To Fix First